Related

Article

Van Nistelrooy still expects Ronaldo to join Madrid

Jonathan Roorda - 8 October 2008 23:02

Cristiano Ronaldo

MADRID (SW) - Real Madrid striker Ruud van Nistelrooy believes that Manchester United's Cristiano Ronaldo will one day make a move to Real Madrid.

In an interview with Spanish sports paper Marca, Van Nistelrooy said to expect that the Portuguese winger will join 'Los Galacticos' next summer, "or the one after".

Ronaldo was close to a move this summer but Real Madrid and Manchester United never came to an agreement. After undergoing surgery, the forward recently made his return to the pitch.

The Portuguese star does have a long term contract with United, who seem anything but willing to let him go without a fight.

Despite this summer's transfer rumours, Ronaldo's popularity among United fans doesn't seem to have received a knock.

Click here for betting.

Comments (9)

phughes699

9 October 2008 14:54

It would be a lot better for everyone , if Van Nistleroy kept his opinions to himself. Why on Earth does he come out with this bullshit when he knows what happened during the summer. He says it may be next summer....or the next. What he means is that he doesn't really know and is just making a story up to stir the shit again in the newspapers. Van Nistleroy, you enjoyed your time at Old Trafford, now give Ronaldo a chance to enjoy his time. There is no need to talk fullstop.

Cile_car

9 October 2008 19:15

Paul, the funny thing is that he changes his mind every week! One week he's sick of all the rumours and tells the media to focus on their current squad and the next week you see him telling stories like this one. My opinion is that United will let him go in about 2-3 years time if he doesn't sign a new contract.

Chelsea4ever

9 October 2008 21:25

Just wish that he is not leaving already in January if they want to pay their debts as football governing body is pressing all clubs in debts to do it..

achavabill

10 October 2008 04:30

yeah ronaldo will be playing at real madrid after this oldies two veteren van nisteroy and raul retired from playing at real madrid....so dream on van nisterooy........real madrid already had rivalry MANCHESTER CITY AND CHELSEA to lure ronaldo to playing for them next season......me as man utd fans suggest you tripple idiot club to make good offer and higher pay to MAN UTD FC and make MAN UTD FC richest club if you guys want C,ronaldo.......since real madrid already got rivalry 80 million pound is not enough to get ronaldo !!!....i hope manchester city make more good offer then REAL MADRID !!...khaa khaa what a poor real madrid

newtonheath1878

10 October 2008 08:40

Chelsea4ever:

Ronaldo or no Ronaldo United have the income to more than accommodate their so called debts (which are secured against the Glazers assets not the club by the way). If any one team should be concerned about debt then it is Chelsea. Chelsea are practically insolvent and rely on soft loans from Roman, if he was to walk away the proverbial would definitely hit the fan as Chelsea do not have the turnover to accommodate their players salaries never mind any other debt or overheads. Agree with me or not United are the blueprint on how a football club can be ran as a business and are better placed than most to deal with the current economic climate!

Chelsea4ever

10 October 2008 11:21

Good to be so confident , like we hear it everywhere even we are facing a real crash and believe me big firms are the most who suffers and next of course will be the big clubs ....

Roman would laugh if he reads this , he wont run away dont be worried about it , he is so happy in London and England wont let him run away .I more scared about american ownership who are crashing actually very badly then Dubai Group ownership or Roman who are in total safety . You dont have to agree if you dont want to , but the nearest future will tell us and you will come back here to say you were right guys .

newtonheath1878

10 October 2008 14:24

Chelsea4ever:

I appreciate everybody is entitled to there opinion but it is pointless me arguing with you because with due respect your comments above are fact less, but hey ho I’ll say my piece!

Firstly, as I stated, the debt that is so called attached to United is £666 million but in reality it is not attached to the club the money the Glazers borrowed are loans secured on other assets of the Glazer families assets not the club this was legally secured clause before there imminent takeover during Uniteds Plc days. If the Glazers were to fall foul of the current economic climate the only effect it would have on United as a business or football club would be that the Glazers may have to sell one of assets which may possibly be the club, if that was the case then United would have new owners (and in reality I don’t think they would have a problem finding a buyer for the biggest brand in football do you?). For the above to happen would be a slim chance as United’s basic income is £250 million per annum, more than enough to service the repayments!

Secondly, there is a huge difference between the acquisition of Manchester City by the Abu Dhabi United Group (not the Dubai Group as you incorrectly stated) and Chelsea’s ownership by Roman Abramovich. The ADU Group acquired MCFC with the sole purpose to use it as a tool to assist the Emirate in promoting other economic interests within the Emirate. The oil resources which they have heavily relied on for the past 40-50 years will in the not so distant future, run dry! Therefore during recent times they have been investing heavily in other financial interest’s one of them being sport with a view to making the Emirate the premier sporting facility in the region. Their thinking is that if they can turn MCFC into the leading club in the world (which is debatable, and they might just move onto another club if it doesn’t work) will only assist them in gaining investment and prominence to help them achieve this goal. In short the city takeover is a long term investment not just solely attached to football. Abramovich on the other hand bought Chelsea as a plaything not as an investment, admittedly the man is not stupid by any means but as with any child playing a game if doesn’t start winning all the time he could quite easily throw is toys out of the pram. If this was the case (which I personally don’t think will happen in the near future) then Chelsea would be in serious poo because unlike United their turnover doesn’t cover their operating costs, they wouldn’t necessarily be in debt unless Roman insisted on being paid the soft loans he has given to the club but they definitely would have to off load their star players as they would not be able to justify their salaries as year in year out they have been operating with record losses.

Need I say more?

babyboy

11 October 2008 03:48

van nistilrooy is so cheap he shouldnt even be talking

tshukela

14 October 2008 00:10

Viva la Madrid!!!! If Cris Ronaldo is one of the best players, then his home is madrid!!!!!!

Sponsored links